<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court &quot;fills in the blank&quot; to recognize retaliation claims for federal employees under ADEA; Gomez-Perez v. Potter, 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capuderfantasia.com/blog/index.php/2008/05/supreme-court-fills-in-the-blank-to-recognize-retaliation-claims-for-federal-employ-under-adea-gomez-perez-v-potter-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capuderfantasia.com/blog/2008/05/supreme-court-fills-in-the-blank-to-recognize-retaliation-claims-for-federal-employ-under-adea-gomez-perez-v-potter-2008/</link>
	<description>By Drew M. Capuder, Capuder Fantasia PLLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Capuder&#8217;s Employment Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drew Capuder will be speaking on retaliation law on Oct 29-30, 2010 at Oglebay Park in Wheeling</title>
		<link>http://capuderfantasia.com/blog/2008/05/supreme-court-fills-in-the-blank-to-recognize-retaliation-claims-for-federal-employ-under-adea-gomez-perez-v-potter-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Capuder&#8217;s Employment Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Drew Capuder will be speaking on retaliation law on Oct 29-30, 2010 at Oglebay Park in Wheeling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capuderfantasia.com/blog/?p=253#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>[...] against retaliation. The US Supreme Court especially has focused on retaliation law, and has “plugged gaps” in the law for federal employees to include protection for retaliation claims, has lowered the threshold for what is actionable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] against retaliation. The US Supreme Court especially has focused on retaliation law, and has “plugged gaps” in the law for federal employees to include protection for retaliation claims, has lowered the threshold for what is actionable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.294 seconds -->
